Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
Jayco RV Owners Forum
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 03-14-2014, 01:01 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 70
Aerodynamics and fuel savings

Here is a picture of a nose cone (www.nosecone.com) attached to a travel trailer. Something like the picture here is about $728 plus shipping. You install it (DIY) or drive to California and have the company do it.

It can even be installed (for those with a window in front) with a hinge across the top of the nose cone with pressure gas shocks to lift it like a hatch and fastened at the bottom with those rubber hood latches found on tractor trailer fenders.

Just wanted everyone here to see that it is available for our units, even the 7' Swifts's Part Number NC58-RM2 (They will trim to 84")

Spoke with their service dept. Here is a snippit of our conversation:

"No more white knuckle driving" is the best comment! The comments always include, "less trailer sway when being passed by a big truck, I no longer have to watch my rear view mirror and grip the wheel tight when a big truck is coming from behind". Fuel economy improves by 10 up to 20% depending on gas or diesel power. The trailer is less affected by wind. Able to climb hills easier and with less downshifting. More power!!
Kathy Rose.

FYI
Scott MacDonald
Attached Thumbnails
nosecone.jpg   NoseConeHinged.jpg  
smacdonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2014, 09:15 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dale Hollow Lake Tn/Ky
Posts: 2,525
Don't see the need. My W Hawk pulls easy without any sway at all. Wondering why I would want to spend this amount of $$$'s to bet on a 10 0r 20 % fuel savings. Product looks like you bolted on one of my grandkid's plastic splash pool.
Bassdogs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2014, 09:26 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Aurora CO
Posts: 2,334
How did it work out for you?
__________________
Jim & Kim from Colorado

2014 Eagle 30.5 RLS
2015 Dodge 3500HD SRW 6.7L
Click on my profile for Mods and notes
Jmooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2014, 09:34 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Threebutchers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 6,818
I might consider it if I was a snowbird who took my TT from Michigan to Florida every year. Even then, I would think it would take years to pay itself.
Threebutchers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2014, 09:42 AM   #5
Moderator Emeritus
 
Rustic Eagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,424
Looks like the same product that is added on flat front semi-trailers, see them often going down the highway.

IMO the manufacture's claims may be a little on the aggressive side, but I'm sure it would improve on some wind resistance characteristics. After all most FW's and some TT's (i.e.; Eagle) have rounded front caps.

Bob
__________________

2016 GM 2500HD 6.0L/4.10
2018 Jay Flight 24RBS
2002 GM 2500HD 6.0L/4:10 (retired)
2005 Jayco Eagle 278FBS (retired)
1999 Jayco Eagle 246FB (retired)
Reese HP Dual Cam (Strait-Line)
Rustic Eagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2014, 09:56 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
greenenvy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 519
Trucking fleets use items like these because they can realize the efficencies due to the volume of trucks in their fleet. Would take a few years to recoup the savings this may or may not produce. I seriously doubt an individual would see a 10-20% mpg increase using this item. At the end of the day you are till dragging a parachute behind you and the drag will always be present. SLowing down is still the most effective way to increase your mpgs.
__________________
1990 Jayco 250 Special
2008 Ram 5500 DRW 6.7, Cummins, Aisin auto
Holland/Binkley 5th wheel, Reese Dual Cam, and more
232,500 kms in 2013
200,000 kms in 2014
160,000 kms in 2015
greenenvy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2014, 10:18 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Aurora CO
Posts: 2,334
I've often wondered how effective the spoilers are that you see on roof top of TVs ahead of the truck bed and TT
__________________
Jim & Kim from Colorado

2014 Eagle 30.5 RLS
2015 Dodge 3500HD SRW 6.7L
Click on my profile for Mods and notes
Jmooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2014, 10:27 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Seann45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Saskatoon Sask Canada
Posts: 10,726
You will not own the RV or drive far enough for that to ever pay for itself.. I have a highrise campershell on the back of my truck that does the same thing as this does (no I did not buy it for mileage gains but for storage security) It makes a difference in mileage but not enough to justify it as a fuel saving feature.
__________________
Seann
2004 Chev Silverado Duramax optioned past the max. 2009 Jayco Eagle 308 RLS 900watts of solar, Lithium batteries (400amp hour), 2000 watt (4000 surge) whole house inverter.
145days /2023 2022/151 2021[/COLOR]
93/2020,157/2019219/2018 206/2017,215/2016, 211/2015, 196/14, 247/13, 193/12

Seann45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2014, 09:00 PM   #9
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 70
You guys are all correct. It will take time to pay itself back. But thats not the point. The point is this product reduces drag which pays back in fuel savings on every fill up. I am only showing other owners whats available. New owners who complain about fuel costs can realize savings with this install. Some new mfgs know the reality of aerodynamic and the proof is in the shapes of the fronts on many of the newest models on the market. I know, from experience, when i pull my trailer, my fuel economy is cut in half. That means $50 min on each fillup. If i travel to South Florida and back to Canada (Toronto) thats roughly 6 fillups down and 6 fillups. Saving 20% is huge, especially for Canadians with an $0.89 dollar exchange. If i can save $10 to $15 bucks each fill, my trip will save me one fillup.

Anyway, this was posted to show owners that there are options and that paying attention to aerodynamics is real.

What you choose to do with this info is up to you.

Cheers,
Scott
smacdonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2014, 09:03 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Aurora CO
Posts: 2,334
Let's us know how it goes over time Scott.

Thanks for the interesting post
__________________
Jim & Kim from Colorado

2014 Eagle 30.5 RLS
2015 Dodge 3500HD SRW 6.7L
Click on my profile for Mods and notes
Jmooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2014, 07:40 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
xkuzme1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 289
There are 3 different types of drag: form, parasite, and induced.

In this case, induced drag is measured by the drag coefficient (design and imperfections).

Parasite is the drag caused by the roughness of the surface.

Form drag is basically caused by the speed at which you are pulling. The faster you pull, the more drag you create. A certain form is designed to operate at a certain speed. It's been a long time, but I think the formula says that to: increase speed by 10% beyond you must square the horsepower.

Long story short, I am sure that fairing kit will work a little by proving upon the induced drag characteristics. I think you could get nearly the same results by slowing down to around 60 mph (normally the benchmark for designers), taking a tube of caulking and smoothing out all the corner sections and seams, waxing your trailer, and making sure your wheels are inflated properly.

I actually think that you could get more use out of a spoiler at the rear of the trailer that would counter act the vortices and suction behind the trailer.

I think it'll help, but I think you'd have to pull 200,000 miles to notice it. There are better places to start.

X
__________________
...she started talking about how I never listened to her or somethin, I donno, I wasn't really paying attention...

2017 Jayco 287BHSW
xkuzme1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2014, 08:19 AM   #12
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 70
Here is the thing about this thread. There are a lot of folks who don't like that their fuel economy is cut in half or more when they pull their trailers. For those who only use their trailers for short caping excursions, whatever they do to improve aerodynamics is not going to gain them much in the form of payback through fuel savings. But, those who do haul long distances a couple of time a year, should see significant savings in fuel, if they improve their aerodynamics. Sorry, a wax job does virtually nothing, and what it does help improve is so insignificant it's only worth doing to make your rig look nice. Neither is smoothing out the seams with a caulking gun.
Everyone I have ever talked to uses the airstream as a benchmark for the ultimate in towing and efficiency, why? because of it's shape. In order to come close to that (If) your trailer is relatively flat, there are a few things an owner can do to improve the towability and improve fuel savings at the pump.

Realize that a flat front is essentially a parachute you are pulling along at 60 mph. hit a hill and watch your truck react. Not only does it have to contend with the hill, and the actual weight of your trailer, that parachute is still acting upon your tow vehicle as you climb. Horsepower can take care of the trailer weight, but aerodynamic improvements will help eliminate that parachute and the drag it creates.

For owners with a pickup as a tow vehicle, you have a couple of choices, add a cap over the bed and reduce the height difference between your truck and the campers roofline and also reduce the "gap" between which helps reduce turbulance and overall drag. If you add a wing to the rear of your cap, even better, move the air over the top of your trailer essentially punching a hole in the air. If you don't want the cap solution, or you have a lower roofline vehicle like an SUV or a Sedan car, your choices to improve aerodynamics is somewhat limited. The only real solution is to look at making your trailer more "wind friendly" - mimic the Airstreams lines as much as possible.

The nose cone essentially does this, yes there is a cost, but so is a truck cap, either way there is a cost involved. Or trade in your square tailer for one of those new factory rounded front trailers on the market today.

Hmmmm... wonder where the manufacturers got the brilliant idea to round the front of their new models. Probably has a lot to do with towability and fuel economy, but thats just a guess.

I want owners to know that there are options to improve fuel savings, and yes there is a cost to get there, but the way I see it, either you pay the manufacturer to improve aerodynamics and it is reflected in the retail price or you find other solution as suggested in this thread, but there is a cost - either way. I know how angry I was the first time I took a trip with our camper. I was not impressed to have to double my expected fuel budget for that trip.

Do what works best for you. If you are happy with your fuel economy, great - have a wonderful life, if not, you can do something about it.
smacdonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Jayco, Inc. or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2002-2016 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.