Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
Jayco RV Owners Forum
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 04-24-2017, 07:17 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Dallas
Posts: 377
I drove both the Chevy 6.0 and Ram 6.4 before ending up with the Ram 2500 with the diesel. My preference would have been a Chevy with the Duramax but the price wasn't competitive at the time (new body style intro). I've owned a couple of Chevy 1/2 tons before that and a 2011 Ford F-250 with the diesel.

The Ram with the 6.4 had a good feel to it but that GM 6.0 has a long track record of being a great engine. I've been around several with 300k miles on them as daily work trucks and when properly maintained they were very trouble free.

One thing to consider is the dealer you'll use for warranty work and service. I couldn't wait to get rid of the Ram because the local dealers around here suck royally. There are several Chevy/GMC dealers around that are leaps and bounds better.

Both will serve you well but if you're a Chevy guy... I think you'll be happier with the Chevy long term.
__________________
2017 Jayco Redhawk 29XK - SOLD 10/19
2015 Wrangler JKU
2019 Ford F-250
2019 Open Range 310BHS - (a Jayco Division)
drk98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2017, 07:27 PM   #22
Senior Member
 
repacs0103's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Millington
Posts: 368
Agreed with others... the GM LS based 6.0 is tried and true and absolutely bulletproof. We have a handful st work and they tow heavier than most on this forum do.... 10k-14k daily plus plowing in the winter, and we have to do nothing to them. I've only ever had to do a couple MAF sensors, and I have anywhere from 0-260k on mine. Also the 6L80E is a great trans, just like the 4L80E before it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Rob, Sarah, Ella, Ava

2017 Eagle HT 29.5BHDS -- 2011 F350 CCSB 4x4 PSD
repacs0103 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2017, 07:47 PM   #23
Site Team
 
Crabman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Virginia`s Eastern Shore
Posts: 17,093
Quote:
Originally Posted by Popcycle View Post
I owned a 2011 Chevy 1500 with AFM for 4 years and never had a bit of trouble with it. It got great fuel milage on the highway and it pulled hard when asked. Not sure why some owners had complaints but my experience was all good.
There were issues with some of them burning oil, and lots of it. The only real fix was some modifications and in many cases a total engine rebuild. Of course not all of them had these issues and tbe 4.8 did not have them either. Pages and pages of reading on the Sierra/Silverado forum about this.
Crabman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2017, 03:58 AM   #24
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Absecon
Posts: 83
My father just picked up the 6.4 with 3.73 gears and loves it, but he did say if he were towing in the mountains he would prefer the 4.10 gears
Cummins-a-pullin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2017, 06:27 AM   #25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 721
Quote:
Originally Posted by Popcycle View Post
I owned a 2011 Chevy 1500 with AFM for 4 years and never had a bit of trouble with it. It got great fuel milage on the highway and it pulled hard when asked. Not sure why some owners had complaints but my experience was all good.
You might have had one after the revisions. I don't know on the 5.3l but on the 6.2l in my Denali they made some changes as the earlier ones had the same issues. The problem mainly has to do with the use of low friction piston rings. They use these to better fuel efficiency. Where the problem came in is when the AFM kicked in and it would drop to 4 cylinder mode they would hold the valves open because if it isn't getting fuel but still going through the compression stroke it would kill MPG. However this reduces cylinder pressure to 0. The piston rings are designed to have that cylinder pressure there to help keep them sealed up. Over time you would start to run into issues where the piston rings would fail and you start consuming oil on those cylinders.

I want to say the revisions to correct these issues came about in 2010 with the 6.2l anyhow.

Back to the the OP. I will say I love the 6.2l in my GMC but they never offered it on the 3/4 ton. 403 HP and 417 torque. At those numbers it is very close to what the Dodge does.

I know you said the diesel isn't in the budget but I would really do what I could to go that route. They hold value better so while it will cost more up front you will get it back in the end. I have read a few comments elsewhere that it takes 100,000 miles to hit break even. That isn't always the case when you consider trade in value. Depending on how much towing you do the improved MPG numbers come a lot quicker. The 6.0 is more than capable to pull your camper, never driven one. I will say that the Duramax does feel really nose heavy (commuting) as I have driven them quite a bit. So maybe the 6.0 being a much lighter engine will not feel the same.
__________________
2011 GMC Yukon Denali AWD
2017 Jayco Jay Feather 25BH
sennister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2017, 09:14 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
jsallman1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Ames
Posts: 297
So far, I have been happy with the Ram 6.4 and tow power, longest trip was between South Dakota and Orlando, I didn't have an issue maintaining speeds in the mountains as long as you let it downshift.

When I was making my decision between the 3, total length decided it for me, ram was the only one that would make it in the garage and allow the door to shut.

Suspension on the Ram 3/4 ton is also coil vs leaf if you haven't looked into that.

If I were to do it again, I'd still get the ram due to the length issue, but I might go for a 3500SRW (no more expensive to register in my state). Little things like you cant adjust the TPMS easily on a 2500 if you want to run the tires a little lower than the recommended 80PSI, 3500 doesn't have the warning lights, just a passive monitoring system. Also why not have more payload :-) . If I ever drove it commercially however, that might throw a wrench in things.

Only other thing that disappointed me on the Rams was the cost to keep some of the electronic features active, like 911 Dial, remote start via phone, locating the truck via phone in a packed lot, etc was a bit pricey when compared to Ford for sure.
__________________
2016 Jayflight 29BHDS
2015 Ram 2500 Laramie Crew Cab - 6.4 Hemi
2013 Ford F150 Supercrew EcoBoost, MaxTow (Loved and Sold)

ProPride 3P

jsallman1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2017, 06:52 PM   #27
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Green Springs
Posts: 100
If you get the Ram find one with the 4.10 gears. I have a Ram 6.4 with 4.10 gears. Tow a 2014 314bhds. Picking up a 324bhts on Saturday. It tows pretty well. I find the transmission tuning buggy. But you have that with all brands and is subjective to my preferences. Personally I think Ford makes the best gasser out there with the 4.30 gears and transmission gearing. Food for thought.
15BlueStreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2017, 09:14 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Gilroy
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iraqvet05 View Post
Seahawks_12, I had a 2007.5 1500 I towed the 26BH with before I moved to the 2500. I hated the 4 speed and 5.3/3.42 gears but loved the fuel mileage. I'd love a diesel one day but it's just not in the budget. I've heard the horror stories about the Ford 6.0s and know the Cummins is a more reliable engine but I probably couldn't afford to maintain it. Last week we had a Ford work truck with a 6.4 diesel go into limo mode. I replaced the fuel filters twice at the recommendation of a Ford mechanic but it still had a low fuel pressure rail code. The truck is in the shop now for an injector pump replacement to the tune of $4300 and the truck has 74k miles on it.


Check out the Titan XD with Cummins. You'll spend up to $10K less than the HD diesels, get a 5/100K bumper to bumper, and it'll tow every bit as nicely as the HD diesels with your size trailer other than a sacrifice of some acceleration due to the smaller 5.0L. I came out of a 2015 dmax, loved my dmax, but I'm pulling a 314bhs and saved some money by going with the XD over a new dmax.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
2018 Jayco NorthPoint 377RLBH
2017 Ruby Red F350 Lariat Ult CCLB SRW
Truck Covers USA American Work Cover
Andersen Ultimate 5ver Hitch
bzeller is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Jayco, Inc. or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2002-2016 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.