Quote:
Originally Posted by Camp CA
Why did you decide to replace the suspension and brakes with IS and disc brakes?
|
Good question. I keep running the numbers and my OCD from my previous career in aviation, left me uncomfortable with the margins. Example: Our unit has a maximum allowable weight of 17650. Assume loaded to exactly max and assume 20%(3530) on the truck that leaves us with 14,120 on the axles. The axles are rated for 7k but I do note that the tag on the axles indicates 7,400. Assuming 7k is the actual number then we are over the rated capacity of the axle. Assuming 7.4k is a good number then we are inside 680 pounds of max, or less than 5% under max.
Yes I know the numbers will be slightly different over the scale and we can move weight to the back, or to the front, to help with the load displacement, but at that point I think we are just picking fly poop out of pepper.
As well the independent suspension will definitely smooth out the ride and likely provide us with a longer rv lifespan. I am the first one to crap on an industry that does not seem interested in overall quality, however, the poor suspensions on stock units, coupled with highways that will make you urinate blood, it is no wonder cupboard doors fall off, fiberglass becomes delaminated, and roofs fall apart. Not entirely the industry's fault that we are pulling a rolling earthquake.
The hydraulic disc brakes need no justification. Drum brakes, coming from a design from a previous century, should be illegal on units over 10k (or pick your number).