And you know for fact that those are the only people that could ever have a frame bend because all the leaning pressure is in a 2” diameter circle of an already thin cheap metal frame that has no design included in the frame for this stress.
No, I do not know for a fact that they are the only people "that could ever have a frame bend" because "leaning pressure" is in a 2" diameter circle on a cheap metal frame. However, I do know that the couple you referenced are a very poor example to use as a claim against Sumos. If the Sumos did that to a frame, the frame is the problem, not the Sumos. Moreover, taking RVs off road and across rough terrain and roads will damage most RVs. Definitely, driving them into ditches (torquing the frame) could well cause damage to the frame, suspension, the walls, and/or the roof. The majority of RVs are rolling dollhouses.
People think they can haul trailers anywhere and everywhere. The fact is, they are not built for the way many use them. In the case of Grand Design, their "fine print" states that their trailers are not meant to be driven off of pavement, and they are not meant for continuous travel. So all of the gravel, dirt, and pastures that people drive on to boondock or travel to places like Alaska are beyond most trailers' design capacities. There are only a handful of RVs that are built to withstand off-pavement travel.
I do believe that a properly loaded trailer that is towed 55-65 mph on pavement will not get a cracked or bent frame from anything other than a frame flaw. The only exception might be a nasty pothole at freeway speed; that could potentially damage the frame, but the suspension (leaf, shackle, hanger . . .) would likely fail, not the frame and not because of the Sumos. I believe the opposite is true. The Sumos would likely keep the frame and the suspension from absorbing all of the impact and reduce the possibility of excessive frame flexing.