Jaymesco
New Member
I have 4 kids and a Jayfeather x23b. Anyone out there been pulling a Jayfeather with a QX80 (and a family)? Thinking about buying one. What are your thoughts? The Old suburban 5.3L proved ineffective.
You shoulda sold the qx56 and not the mustang! ��
Thanks for the info. Helpful!
When we started in the RV world, I towed with the DW's QX56 (same as QX80) without issue. The issue was the the fuel milage was horrible and we were constantly having to stop for fuel. When towing, it killed my rear tires (24")...by killed, I mean it ate away at the tread and shortened the lifespan. Additionally, we had the full time AWD version. Our TT was heavier than the unit you are asking about, but ultimately I sold my Ford Mustang GT 500 convertible (that's a mouthful!) and purchased a HD truck to tow with. Hope my info helps with your decision! Happy camping!
I think you're spot on. I think the math is GVWR 7500 - Curb weight 6,085?
I will have nearly 700lbs of humans inside and you're saying the rest of that is tongue weight? which i need to measure. Trailer is 4400lb dry. I'm estimating 5400 loaded?
this was my vehicle review, but he doesn't have the payload i do.
While modern SUVs are marvels of engineering, one of those marvels, the IRS, is geared for safety and stability over towing. The IRS alignment changes as the wheel moves up and down. Great for handling and not rolling over in a top-heavy SUV at speed, not so good for towing, as you noticed. That's the great thing about "dumb", heavy solid axles: no camber and especially no toe changes as the wheels travel.
I think you're spot on. I think the math is GVWR 7500 - Curb weight 6,085?
I will have nearly 700lbs of humans inside and you're saying the rest of that is tongue weight? which i need to measure. Trailer is 4400lb dry. I'm estimating 5400 loaded?
this was my vehicle review, but he doesn't have the payload i do.
Did the suburban have a tow package? I'm thinking not. If the Suburban didn't handle, why would you think the QX 80 will? IMO you will be right at the edge of your weights, maybe over. A Suburban is 3 times the truck that a QX80 is.
IRS is absolutely better for towing than an archaic live axle. IRS has a wider stance, hence, provides more stability. Live axles are used in many towing applications just because it is simple, cheap to make and maintain type of suspension. However, if you can afford maintenance of IRS, live axle is not even close in terms of the performance.
...The OPs Infiniti is clearly not.
I heard this from a car engineer - if you were to install IRS or live axle on the same car, the IRS will have a wider stance due to different mounting design.
Small squat is fine and doesn't change significantly tires alignment. If you have significant squat, it means that the car is not properly set up for towing (e.g. too heavy tongue weight, no weight distribution, no airbags, etc.). It is difficult to compare incorrectly set up tow vehicle with IRS to a vehicle with live axle. However, I would agree that live axle is more idiot proof.
Why OPs Infiniti is "clearly" not designed/set up for towing?
Why? I towed with my 2011 Infiniti QX 56 (same as the 80) with the family and TT in tow for 2 years without any issues. It had full time AWD and air suspension.
sorry, second poster ate their tires. Because the tires were eaten.
Air suspension is what I specificially listed as making things OK
Did the suburban have a tow package? I'm thinking not. If the Suburban didn't handle, why would you think the QX 80 will? IMO you will be right at the edge of your weights, maybe over. A Suburban is 3 times the truck that a QX80 is.