Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
Jayco RV Owners Forum
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 10-06-2017, 03:28 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Perry
Posts: 18
K&N Intake on Triton V10

We have a 2006 Jayco Greyhawk 30GS and dolly tow a 2008 Saturn Vue. Gas mileage is about 6.5 mpg or 8 if not towing. I was just wondering if anyone had installed a K&N intake and if it improved their fuel mileage enough to make the $380. dollar price tag worth it? Like many RV'ers I usually just put the nossel in and fill it up without paying much attention, but in the interest of economics I feel I should at least consider this.

Thanks
Dick
DandV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2017, 03:34 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Bookemdanno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: DFW
Posts: 3,493
I can't speak to the Greyhawk in particular, but every vehicle I've ever had since I was 18 yoa, has had a K&N intake/filter. Too me the reusable filter alone has been worth the cost! I just put it on my Ram 3500.
__________________
Dan
'24 GMC 2500 AT4X AEV Edition
Bookemdanno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2017, 03:50 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 957
I put one on a mid sized PU several years ago, and all it really accomplished was creating a "roar" or low growl when I hit the gas pedal hard. I grew tired of the noise. MPG might increase a 1/10th or 2 depending on conditions. GH's have plenty of power to move the unit down the road and up most if not all inclines. I would just another tank of gas, JMO.
__________________
'08 Greyhawk 31SS Traded in
2018 MR2410RL
Goodyear Endurance
Equalizer WDH
TV 2018 F150 FX4 SC 3.5EB TP/MT
jimp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2017, 04:57 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
repacs0103's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Millington
Posts: 368
You will never recoup the cost in fuel. In a NA engine like the V10 there is minimal performance gains and zero mileage gains. On a forced induction motor you will see a mild performance gain. As bookedemdanno pointed out, though, there is something to be said for never having to buy another air filter again.

Consider buying a K&N drop in filter for your factory air box- much cheaper and pays for itself after 2 or 3 filter change intervals.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Rob, Sarah, Ella, Ava

2017 Eagle HT 29.5BHDS -- 2011 F350 CCSB 4x4 PSD
repacs0103 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2017, 05:02 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,650
You will hate all the new engine noise, that rush of air gets very annoying. Save your $380 and put it in the fuel tank for more enjoyment.
Sundancer330 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2017, 06:27 PM   #6
Site Team
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Connellsville
Posts: 22,723
Google K&N filters and "dusting".
__________________
Moderator
2017 Jay Feather 7 22BHM Baja/Andersen WD
2018 F150 4x4 3.5L Ecoboost Max Tow
2015 MB Sprinter 2500 Passenger 2.1L Diesel
2007 Ram 2500 4x4 Cummins 5.9L G56

Midnightmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2017, 10:01 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Springfield
Posts: 558
I use to live a 1/4 mile down a dusty road. I tried the K&N in my Cummins diesel. After a week I inspected it and I could draw pretty circles in the dust on the inside of my intake so I took it out. The K&N filters we're originally developed for race track use, not highway use, to keep the bigger clods of dirt out. Those guys don't care about engine wear. If you want more power my own opinion is get the Banks headers. It's the only thing that actually worked for 1/2 mpg better and more oomph for me.
t18skyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2017, 05:59 AM   #8
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Perry
Posts: 18
K&N Intake

Thanks all for your input. I think I will put the $380 into my tank and not worry about it. See you on the open road!
DandV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2017, 07:33 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
The Logans's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: North Western West Virginia
Posts: 671
All it did for us was add to the noise level in the cab. There was no change in fuel consumption, and no noticeable improvement in engine performance.
__________________
The Logan's
2018 Jayco Alante 31v
Me, Dear Wife,
2 Bluetick Hounds
1 Newfoundland
1 Newfoundland / Black Lab Mix
1 Cairn Terrier
The Logans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2017, 07:53 AM   #10
Lost in the Woods
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 256
K&N filters are much less effective at removing contaminants than regular paper filter, and for this reason alone I won't use them in both my daily and off-road vehicles. Besides, new vehicles are finely tuned, and the flow difference might set off engine codes.
Danno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2017, 05:57 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Rochester
Posts: 109
As stated above, they are only good on a race engine that you aren’t all that concerned about filtration. They do not filter as well as a paper filter, if over oiled, which is pretty easy to do, the excess oil can ruin your MAF sensor, and have been shown to be harmful on the Cummins turbo diesel (so I’d do a bit of research on dusting Bookemdanno and consider putting the oem setup back on your truck).
Wertles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2017, 06:13 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Bookemdanno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: DFW
Posts: 3,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wertles View Post
As stated above, they are only good on a race engine that you aren’t all that concerned about filtration. They do not filter as well as a paper filter, if over oiled, which is pretty easy to do, the excess oil can ruin your MAF sensor, and have been shown to be harmful on the Cummins turbo diesel (so I’d do a bit of research on dusting Bookemdanno and consider putting the oem setup back on your truck).
Awesome...one more thing of me to research! Thanks for the info.
__________________
Dan
'24 GMC 2500 AT4X AEV Edition
Bookemdanno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2017, 06:20 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
repacs0103's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Millington
Posts: 368
Another option is something similar to the AEM dryflow.... an open flowing filter without the K&N oil. I've had one on my tweaked 12V Cummins with a prefilter sock for 25000+ miles of hard commercial towing and plowing with zero ill effects.... and the truck screams.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Rob, Sarah, Ella, Ava

2017 Eagle HT 29.5BHDS -- 2011 F350 CCSB 4x4 PSD
repacs0103 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2017, 11:03 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
memphis02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 409
I can confirm that the K&N Filters are complete and total garbage. I had one on a 5.3L Vortec that completely destroyed the MAF Sensor, gummed up the EGR with fine particulate and fouled the plugs, which in-turn put raw gas into the catalytic converter, ruining it.
For the few extra HP you 'might' get out of one, IMHO, they are completely worthless.
__________________
'14 Jayco Seneca 37fs
20' Look Enclosed Trailer
memphis02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Jayco, Inc. or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2002-2016 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.