Journey with Confidence RV GPS App RV Trip Planner RV LIFE Campground Reviews RV Maintenance Take a Speed Test Free 7 Day Trial ×
Jayco RV Owners Forum
 


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 12-24-2018, 07:08 AM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Middle, TN
Posts: 1,098
We love ours. Originally used it with our FJ Cruiser. After we changed to the 3/4-ton truck I had Anderson build us a custom 2-1/2” drawbar that was 3” longer than the normal one that they stock so we can now fully open the tailgate while hooked up.

Great hitch!
__________________
2017 Jayco Hummingbird 17RK Baja (sold)
2020 Rockwood Mini Lite 2109s
2022 Ford F-350 7.3L

https://www.jaycoowners.com/forums/f...ome-41831.html
01tundra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2018, 01:45 PM   #22
Senior Member
 
Murff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: State of Confusion
Posts: 5,014
We owned an Andersen hitch and loved the lightweight and no bars aspect of it. Towed over 30,000 miles with it and no major problems. Our White hawk is the smallest made by Jayco with a GVWR if 5950 lbs.

I did a lot of reading and research before purchasing the Andersen and even advocated it on this forum. I ignored the negative comments I'd read on other forums regarding the inability of the Andersen to transfer weight back to the front axle and bought it anyway. As other owners have stated above, the handling of the TV while towing is great with little sway or even "freeway buck" or when semi trucks pass.

However, after putting the truck and trailer on a scale, and seeing the real world numbers, it really doesn't transfer enough weight. As much as I loved the ease of hitching up the White Hawk with the Andersen, I felt safer going back to a bar system that allows me to be 200 pounds below my rear axle limit than 400 pounds over.

The Andersen does a great job of making the TV and trailer being level. However, not so much in the weight distribution department.

This is based on the current F150 we own. I think the Anderson would be a dynamite hitch when partnered with a 3/4 or 1-ton truck where weight distribution would be less important but one wanted a great hitch for sway control. And, also for lightweight trailers.

Murff
__________________
Murff

2015 White Hawk 20MRB (It's last year)
2017 F150 2.7 Eco Boost 3.73 Gears

Murff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2018, 07:11 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: new england
Posts: 110
I tow a 2017 28 bhbe jayflight with a powerstroke f350 crew cab and the Anderson and it pulls nice and straight!
trashman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2018, 01:05 PM   #24
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: SW
Posts: 513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mbranscum View Post
Looking for opinions on this hitch. Looking for something light and eat to on and off.

Currently have a Husky Centerline and I am tired of throwing 1200 lb bars around.

Tow vehicle is 2017 GMC 2500 with a Jayco Jay Flight 24RBS with approx 6000 lbs weight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by trashman View Post
I tow a 2017 28 bhbe jayflight with a powerstroke f350 crew cab and the Anderson and it pulls nice and straight!
Granted, a WDH is almost mandatory on a 1/2-ton truck for even the smallest travel trailers.

However, is a WDH really necessary for your GMC 2500 and F350 with the trailers you're towing? This is assuming you have the proper tongue weight, of course (closer to 15% is better).

We use a '16 Ram 3500 Cummins SRW to tow our 35 ft. long, Jayco Eagle (almost 10,000 lbs. loaded with 1,400 lbs. of tongue weight) with no WDH. Only get about 1.5" or so of rear end sag and absolutely no hint of sway---even in 25-35 mph cross-winds. We CAT scaled our rig (loaded) and have approx. 47/53 (front/rear) weight distribution (on the Ram) with our Eagle hitched-up and loaded---just about ideal.
CampNow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2018, 02:30 PM   #25
Site Team
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Connellsville
Posts: 22,723
Quote:
Originally Posted by CampNow View Post
Granted, a WDH is almost mandatory on a 1/2-ton truck for even the smallest travel trailers.

However, is a WDH really necessary for your GMC 2500 and F350 with the trailers you're towing? This is assuming you have the proper tongue weight, of course (closer to 15% is better).

We use a '16 Ram 3500 Cummins SRW to tow our 35 ft. long, Jayco Eagle (almost 10,000 lbs. loaded with 1,400 lbs. of tongue weight) with no WDH. Only get about 1.5" or so of rear end sag and absolutely no hint of sway---even in 25-35 mph cross-winds. We CAT scaled our rig (loaded) and have approx. 47/53 (front/rear) weight distribution (on the Ram) with our Eagle hitched-up and loaded---just about ideal.

What are your front axle weights empty and with your trailer?
Midnightmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2018, 03:25 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Salem
Posts: 820
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midnightmoon View Post
What are your front axle weights empty and with your trailer?
With the Cummins up front it's very possible that his front end doesn't raise up much.
BTDT with a 12 Ram CTD and a 950 lbs tongue weight. My rear sagged about 2" and the front only rose 3/8"-1/2" Even with 1200 lbs WD bars the front was sitting at 1/4" high.
If the TT of mention is properly set up then his truck should be fine.
Ram 3500;s with the Cummins have close to 4,000 lbs for CCC. Dropping 1000-1300 lbs on the rear won't really effect much.
goducks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2018, 03:33 PM   #27
Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hudson
Posts: 39
I agree with the others. We purchased an Anderson hitch over 4 years ago, and we are also very happy with it. We pull a 2017 Jay Flight SLX 264bhw (4700 pounds) with a 2018 Silverado 5.3 V8. It’s the only hitch we have ever owned, so I don’t have experience with the other styles. The trailer pulls very nicely. With the electric hitch jack, it is very easy to put on and off.
jmkdopkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2018, 03:36 PM   #28
Site Team
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Connellsville
Posts: 22,723
Quote:
Originally Posted by goducks View Post
With the Cummins up front it's very possible that his front end doesn't raise up much.
BTDT with a 12 Ram CTD and a 950 lbs tongue weight. My rear sagged about 2" and the front only rose 3/8"-1/2" Even with 1200 lbs WD bars the front was sitting at 1/4" high.
If the TT of mention is properly set up then his truck should be fine.
Ram 3500;s with the Cummins have close to 4,000 lbs for CCC. Dropping 1000-1300 lbs on the rear won't really effect much.

I appreciate your input. However, I've owned and towed with a Cummins powered Ram consistently since 1992 so I'm well aware of the weight transfer characteristics of the trucks. Simply wondering how much that 1400# tongue weight pulls from the front axle of his 4th gen 3500 SRW.
Midnightmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2018, 12:11 AM   #29
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: In the Desert
Posts: 1
We have the Anderson and the husband can't say enough good things about it, it's the best ! 2018 Feather
NanaW. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2018, 11:21 AM   #30
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: SW
Posts: 513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midnightmoon View Post
What are your front axle weights empty and with your trailer?
Our '16 Ram 3500 Cummins SRW's front axle weight drops from approx. 4,850 lbs. empty to approx. 4,500 lbs. (with no WDH) when hitched up to an almost 10,000 lb. travel trailer with approx. 1,400 lbs. of tongue weight.

We've driven our rig thousands of miles without a WDH (and several hundred with). There's slightly less sag with a WDH, but little to no improvement in handling and stability. We have that very heavy Cummins sitting over the front axle to thank for this.

We do not subscribe to the opinion that one should use a WDH to get the front axle weight back to what it is empty at all costs. To do this without regard to how evenly weight (payload) is distributed to the front and rear axles---or the truck's FAWR and RAWR, seems a bit short-sighted. Interesting to note that Ram instructs the WDH on their trucks be adjusted so the front axle splits the difference between the unhitched and hitched front fender height. It does not instruct the WDH be adjusted to match the unhitched fender height.

In any event, here are some numbers behind our decision to forgo use of a WDH:

The FAWR on our truck is 6,000 lbs. Hitched up (with no WDH) we have approx. 4,500 lbs. of front axle weight which is approx. 75% of the FAWR. The RAWR is 7,000 lbs. Hitched up (with no WDH) we have approx. 5,000 lbs. on the rear axle which is approx. 72% of the 7,000 lb. RAWR. 75/72 (front/rear) is near equal "mechanical stress" on the front and rear axles. Installing a WDH places the front axle at approx. 80% of the FAWR, and the rear axle at approx. 67% of the RAWR. We see no reason to use a WDH and force the front axle to handle more than its proportional share of the overall payload (based on axle ratings)---especially when it offers little to no improvement in handling and stability.

FWIW, here are the numbers for a 1/2-ton, '12 Tundra 5.7 that we used to tow a 7k travel trailer with 1k of tongue weight. Both, FAWR and RAWR were 3900 lbs. Hitched up without a WDH the front axle carried 66% of it's FAWR, the rear 110% of its RAWR (overloaded by almost 400 lbs.). Hitched up with a WDH the front axle carried 77% of its FAWR, the rear 100% of its RAWR. Notice how these numbers are dramatically different from our Ram 3500. They clearly show why a WDH is absolutely necessary on a 1/2-ton truck!

Bottom line, it's nice being able to safely operate our rig without a WDH. We enjoy not being distracted with installing, adjusting, removing, maintaining, and storing, a heavy WDH. Hitching and unhitching goes very quickly. Especially handy for getting fuel at small, busy gas stations, or running errands while on the road.

YMMV.
CampNow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2018, 12:11 PM   #31
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Salem
Posts: 820
I think people forget how heavy that big 6 CTD is. It's like adding 850 lbs to the front bumper.

2016 Ram 3500 FAW
5.7=4006
6.4=4046
6.7=4891
goducks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2018, 07:13 PM   #32
Site Team
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Connellsville
Posts: 22,723
Quote:
Originally Posted by CampNow View Post
Our '16 Ram 3500 Cummins SRW's front axle weight drops from approx. 4,850 lbs. empty to approx. 4,500 lbs. (with no WDH) when hitched up to an almost 10,000 lb. travel trailer with approx. 1,400 lbs. of tongue weight.

We've driven our rig thousands of miles without a WDH (and several hundred with). There's slightly less sag with a WDH, but little to no improvement in handling and stability. We have that very heavy Cummins sitting over the front axle to thank for this.

We do not subscribe to the opinion that one should use a WDH to get the front axle weight back to what it is empty at all costs. To do this without regard to how evenly weight (payload) is distributed to the front and rear axles---or the truck's FAWR and RAWR, seems a bit short-sighted. Interesting to note that Ram instructs the WDH on their trucks be adjusted so the front axle splits the difference between the unhitched and hitched front fender height. It does not instruct the WDH be adjusted to match the unhitched fender height.

In any event, here are some numbers behind our decision to forgo use of a WDH:

The FAWR on our truck is 6,000 lbs. Hitched up (with no WDH) we have approx. 4,500 lbs. of front axle weight which is approx. 75% of the FAWR. The RAWR is 7,000 lbs. Hitched up (with no WDH) we have approx. 5,000 lbs. on the rear axle which is approx. 72% of the 7,000 lb. RAWR. 75/72 (front/rear) is near equal "mechanical stress" on the front and rear axles. Installing a WDH places the front axle at approx. 80% of the FAWR, and the rear axle at approx. 67% of the RAWR. We see no reason to use a WDH and force the front axle to handle more than its proportional share of the overall payload (based on axle ratings)---especially when it offers little to no improvement in handling and stability.

FWIW, here are the numbers for a 1/2-ton, '12 Tundra 5.7 that we used to tow a 7k travel trailer with 1k of tongue weight. Both, FAWR and RAWR were 3900 lbs. Hitched up without a WDH the front axle carried 66% of it's FAWR, the rear 110% of its RAWR (overloaded by almost 400 lbs.). Hitched up with a WDH the front axle carried 77% of its FAWR, the rear 100% of its RAWR. Notice how these numbers are dramatically different from our Ram 3500. They clearly show why a WDH is absolutely necessary on a 1/2-ton truck!

Bottom line, it's nice being able to safely operate our rig without a WDH. We enjoy not being distracted with installing, adjusting, removing, maintaining, and storing, a heavy WDH. Hitching and unhitching goes very quickly. Especially handy for getting fuel at small, busy gas stations, or running errands while on the road.

YMMV.

Your empty front axle weight is approx 300# heavier than my 2500. Mine scales just about 4550# empty. My trailer is 800# tongue weight and it pulls right about 150# off the front axle without the WD hitch bringing it across the scales at approx 4400#.
Midnightmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2018, 11:22 AM   #33
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: SW
Posts: 513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midnightmoon View Post
Your empty front axle weight is approx 300# heavier than my 2500. Mine scales just about 4550# empty. My trailer is 800# tongue weight and it pulls right about 150# off the front axle without the WD hitch bringing it across the scales at approx 4400#.
I'm assuming you have a Gen 3 (2003-2009) Ram 2500 or an earlier Gen 4 (2010-2013) Ram 2500 Cummins.

The latest Gen 4 (2014-2019) Ram 2500 had its frame and suspension completely revised in 2014. The new frame/suspension increased the base (empty) weight of the truck approx. 300-400 lbs.

FWIW, the empty weight specs (base, front axle, and rear axle) on the latest Gen 4 (2014-2019) Ram 2500 and (2013-2019) Ram 3500 SRW are nearly identical when they're equipped with the same options.
CampNow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2018, 12:26 PM   #34
Site Team
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Connellsville
Posts: 22,723
Quote:
Originally Posted by CampNow View Post
I'm assuming you have a Gen 3 (2003-2009) Ram 2500 or an earlier Gen 4 (2010-2013) Ram 2500 Cummins.

The latest Gen 4 (2014-2019) Ram 2500 had its frame and suspension completely revised in 2014. The new frame/suspension increased the base (empty) weight of the truck approx. 300-400 lbs.

FWIW, the empty weight specs (base, front axle, and rear axle) on the latest Gen 4 (2014-2019) Ram 2500 and (2013-2019) Ram 3500 SRW are nearly identical when they're equipped with the same options.

Correct. 3rd gen quad cab short bed G56 manual trans 5.9l.
Midnightmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2018, 01:53 PM   #35
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: SW
Posts: 513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midnightmoon View Post
Correct. 3rd gen quad cab short bed G56 manual trans 5.9l.
Nice truck. Wish they still made it. Easier to work on (and tune), no DEF, shorter, more nimble wheelbase---not to mention that manual trans, which only Ram offers these days. Rumor is the G56 will probably go away on the Gen 5
CampNow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2018, 03:45 PM   #36
Site Team
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Connellsville
Posts: 22,723
Quote:
Originally Posted by CampNow View Post
Nice truck. Wish they still made it. Easier to work on (and tune), no DEF, shorter, more nimble wheelbase---not to mention that manual trans, which only Ram offers these days. Rumor is the G56 will probably go away on the Gen 5
Thanks. I've had it since new. Purchased it in May of '07. Other than some annoying electrical issues from time to time, it has been a decent truck. I will be hanging on to this one as long as I can keep it on the road. I'm not commuting with it daily anymore so it should make it a while longer.
Attached Thumbnails
20170717_103537.jpg  
Midnightmoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2019, 06:40 PM   #37
Senior Member
 
RAurand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,880
Ok, I want to compare apples with apples.
Is anyone towing a 10,000 pound trailer (Mine Gross weight is 9250 pounds, 6650 empty, and about 8000 pounds at camping weight. with 950 - 1000 pound tongue weight) and an F-150 with the Anderson WDH?

How does it work for you? Really looking closely between Equal-I-Zer or Anderson.
__________________

2012 Ford Expedition EL
2016 28BHBE, Elite and Thermal Packages.
Equal-i-zer 4-point Sway Control, Southwire 34930 Surge Guard 30A, Tire Minder TPMS A1A
(2) Yamaha EF2000iS Generators, Micro-Air EasyStart™ 364 (3-ton) Soft Start, Garmin RV 890, GoodYear Endurance ST225/75-15 Load Range E
RAurand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2019, 06:52 AM   #38
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Tucson
Posts: 661
In my opinion that is a little too much trailer for the truck. I was towing the below trailer at 8,150 with my Tundra CrewMax rated at 10,400 (1,385 cargo) for over a year. After 8 trips it was evident that I needed more truck, if I wanted a more relaxed driving experance. It’s the hills, winds and fuel consumption that kills ya on a 1/2 ton.
__________________
2018 Dodge RAM 2500 / Cummins 6.7 Turbo Diesel
2018 White Hawk 28RL
Scott_Trailer_Newbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


» Featured Campgrounds

Reviews provided by

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
Disclaimer:

This website is not affiliated with or endorsed by Jayco, Inc. or any of its affiliates. This is an independent, unofficial site.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2002-2016 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.